We recently had an interesting discussion on the Creating a Family Facebook Support Group on the offensiveness of using the word “real” in reference to adoption, as in:
- “Is she your real daughter”
- “Do you know anything about his real family”?
Mostly it was adoptive parents in the discussion and most were highly offended by the use of the term “real”. One adoptee in our group wanted to know what more adopted people thought, so she asked the following question to a group of adoptees.
Did it bother you when “real” was used instead of “biological” when people asked adoption questions when you were growing up and now as an adult.
I was thankful she asked the question. Adoptive parents and professionals must hear the voices of adoptees if we want to do right by our children. All decision in adoption should be made on what is in the best interest of the children, so it stands to reason that everyone in the adoption community benefits from listening to the voices and wisdom of adopted people. As always, adult adoptees do not speak with one voice. With her permission I will share the results (paraphrased for length and privacy):
- My Aparents always used “real” when I was young in reference to my birth parents because it was an easier word for a child to understand than biological. I think the term birth parent is more popular now.
- I hated the word “real” when growing up, especially kids my own age asking. My mom used the term birthmother whenever referring to my biological mother. Now that I’m grown up it’s less irritating, but still bugs me a bit.
- The term “real” was used by my peers growing up, and it never bothered me. I understood what they meant.. They were doing the best they could. I would have hardly expected fellow students to know what were the PC terms to use.
- The term “real” never made me feel “less than” or made me feel that Mom and Dad were any different than other moms and dads. I think that the honest and matter of fact way that adoption was explained to me helped.
- I consider myself to have two “real” mothers. The dictionary has different definitions for “mother” which including giving birth to a child and also raising a child. One mother gave birth to me, the other mother raised me.
- I have been told that I shouldn’t consider my birthmother to be one of my mothers and that I only have one mother. I personally believe it is my right to decide who my mothers/fathers are. No, my bmother didn’t raise me, but I also don’t think she went through life totally unaffected by the experience of having a child and never seeing her again.
- I was bothered by biological more than anything. Man, I didn’t like that word then, and I don’t like it now.
- Now I just use Mom and Mother and Dad and Father and people correct me to use “birth” and “biological”, and I ignore them. I’m 36, pretty sure I’m not confused about who is who these days.
- I also consider myself to have 2 mothers. My b-mom is actually the person who told me that she isn’t my mother. According to her, the only mother I have is my adoptive mother. No one, not even my b-mom, has the right to tell me who I should or should not regard as my mother. If she doesn’t want to see me as her daughter, that’s her right. But, I have the right to label her in whatever way is best for me….
- People don’t know what to say. I don’t care if someone wants to use the term “real” when referring to either my adoptive or b-families. And, besides, it’s difficult. Some adoptees believe that their adoptive parents are their real parents, and that’s the term they use. Other adoptees believe that their biological parents are their real parents, and that’s the term the use. I believe all of them are my real parents, but I don’t use that term.
- Personally, I prefer biological parents. That’s what I’ve always used to be able to differentiate between the two sets. I cannot stand the phrase birth parents. But, I accept others’ word choices.
- The term “real” didn’t bother me. Real parents is used when you’re a child, once you are older the word Bio parents is used. I feel its just child and adult terminology.
- I don’t like being told by anyone else who’s my “real” family and who isn’t. It’s my family… it’s up to me to decide. And from where I’m sitting, my birth mother wasn’t a figment of my imagination. I didn’t imagine my adoptive mom, either. Both are real. Both are, by one definition or another, my mothers.
- As for being bothered by the word “real” when I was a kid? Nah, I didn’t like the word, but I simply substituted “birth” or “adoptive” in its place and moved along. As an adult? I like it less… mostly because I tend to hear it used by people who are trying to define my family for me. But I mostly chalk it up to ignorance instead of malice, and try to explain how both sides of my family are equally real…
- Yes, I was bothered if anyone said my a-parents weren’t my “real” parents, or my a-sister wasn’t my “real” sister. I’m bothered if anyone says members of my natural families aren’t “real” family, too. I chalk these kinds of mistakes up to ignorance.
- There is genuine disagreement over the use of other terms. There are different people who are offended by the use of all the following: birth mother, bio-mother, natural mother, first mother. I’ve seen some insist that the only adequate term is just plain “mother.” That’s an understandable argument, but can be confusing in a discussion that involves both mothers. The disagreements are understandable but leave one in a bind as to what to say. I almost wish for the development of completely different terms for all involved.
One of my pet peeves is the assumption that all adopted people will think alike about any topic. Of course they don`t. This diversity means we need to listen to as many adoptees as possible.
Adoptees and adoptive parents: should we be offended by people using the term “real” to refer to kids born to a family vs. adopted into a family, or to refer to the biological family vs. the adopted family? Or is this discussion making a mountain out of a molehill?
Image credit: Sunciti _ Sundaram’s Images + Messages
I have always considered the parents who adopted me to be my ‘real’ parents. I was an infant when adopted. My parents were the ones who were there for every aspect of my life and stuck by me through thick and thin. It takes more than blood to be a ‘real’ parent.
This article is bogus. I grew up in the 70’s and I always used the term “real mom”. Because it is honest and accurate. A mom is the woman you are a part of, who you lived inside of, who gave birth to you. Adopters are none of that. And since time began only one woman was called a mother (and BY GOD) and that is one’s REAL mother.
The fake term is “birthmother”, a man made up word to lessen the real mother, which was made up FOR adopters by their facilitators who do their dirty work in obtaining someone else’s child for them.
I don’t believe an adoptee even said all that was said in this article-it wreaks of adoption propaganda, ie: what adopters and facilitators want us to think and feel, because they never really want to hear our REAL feelings on anything, they just want us to play house quietly and obey like dogs.
Well I for one WON’T..
I won’t go along with yet another game either where adoption agencies and adopters try to pretend like they do care about our feelings just to make them selves look good and cover up how selfish they really are which is the purpose of this article as well. Adoption is NOTHING but lies all around, layers and layers of them and this article is just one more..
The truth is adoptees hate being adopted. And we will tell that truth until the end of time..
Thanks for your comments. Indeed, language about adoption, surrender, and birth families has changed a ton since the 70’s. As has language about the adoption process and adoptee experiences.
And, as we learn more — about language and about the impacts of adoption for all involved, we can grow and take into account what we learn.
Hopefully, that changes all of us so we can grow in our ability to meet the needs of all members of the triad.
Well, what you left out is that the terminology is always cutting down our real moms and us while lifting up infertile couples (and almost exalting them). In the era of forced and automatic closed adoption, the nuns and social workers lied about our mothers not wanting us to know who they were.
And they still do-all this closed record BS SAYS (and I will translate it) your mother is so ashamed of you, you are a bastard and she wants to forget all about you (which is what the social workers and nuns actually said to our real moms, YOU WILL FORGET ABOUT YOUR BABY, which is total crap-no one can forget about their baby and our moms wanted us anyway).
That’s why the system is how it is in closed adoption-and just the fact that adoption agencies including Catholic Charities, still have the audacity to say to us, well we have to ask her if she wants to talk to you or meet you when we call them to find our mothers is intolerable. How anyone can’t see how outrageously insulting that is to us and just how wrong it is to hurt someone like that goes beyond my comprehension.
And add to that, that”birth mother privacy” is a lie to begin with, it just infuriates me that they are still getting away with this.
But what is said today isn’t any better-to the moms and to us-to even suggest we should be given to infertile couples as a gift is just sick-how would these adopters want to be given away to another man by their husband’s as a gift? And all this give a human as a gift to someone else, also reeks of slavery-and yes it was done..
It is also wrong that these adoption agencies are telling single moms that God let them get pregnant so they could give their baby to an infertile couple. That is just another disgusting and manipulative lie.
Like I said before the BS in adoption is so thick, and completely immoral.
And I mean when the hell is it going to stop? After almost 100 years of this?
Nothing truly good ever needed lies to support it or keep it going and if adoption was truly good, and honest and clean, there wouldn’t be so many dark, hurtful lies involved, even in the wording.
Adoption exposes itself..
Indeed, past language empowered and centered the adoptive parents and agencies/professionals. On that, we can agree. However, as we have learned more about the impacts of adoption on the child’s development and as the culture around us has become more sensitive to people-first language, the way we talk about adoption and how we keep the child at the center is also changing.
Thankfully, viewpoints on open adoption are also changing, and research on how beneficial openness can be for the child is making its way into professional spaces. We have many resources to help hopeful adoptive parents research what constitutes an ethical agency and how to navigate open adoption, among other pertinent topics. We are dogged in our determination to keep educating, preparing and supporting parents who wish to adopt — it’s what is best for the child!
Best to you as you navigate your experiences.
But it still isn’t about US. If it was, why are the records still closed? Why is closed adoption STILL even an option and it is. I have seen that on adoption websites. Which is just totally wrong. Closed adoption is a form of mental torture and you adopters don’t know what it’s like.
We are still forced to be second class citizens in our own lives, and with the most self-centered adopters we aren’t even allowed to have our own feelings-they aren’t happy unless we feel like they do and we are punished for not going along which is child abuse.
No one has a right to force a child to feel any certain way.
Also an issue, is the fact that many adopters close an open adoption when the child is one or two-and I have seen forums where they admit that was the plan. Mothers and we adoptees NEED legal protection from this-all open adoptions should stay open anything else is fraud and I want adopters prosecuted for that. Lying is wrong and should not be tolerated. It is also a SIN.
And what is best for the child is ALWAYS knowing who our mothers and fathers are.
Period. There is absolutely NO way around that, whether adopters like it or not. If adopters really want to be parents, be grownups, then they need to control their feelings of jealousy and squelch this immature competition with our parents and do what is best mentally for the kids who are human beings btw with the same needs (family heritage) like everyone else. We adoptees are NOT another species Tracy.
I have never hated being adopted. My experience was good. My parents told me from the time I was able to comprehend the concept, that I was adopted. I grew up with the feeling that I was truly chosen. I was never lied to. Back in the time I was born, (1960) it was the accepted norm to let adoptees believe they were biologically the parents, and everyone pressured them not to tell me that I was adopted. But they couldn’t justify keeping such a monumental truth from me for my entire life. They were wise. I had a friend who at the age of 21, found out she was adopted when her mother died. I remember the enormous identity crisis she went through. The realization that everyone she ever trusted and loved had been lying to her for her entire life. It crushed her. She suffered and never really got over it. I always advise adopting parents to be honest with their children. I couldn’t disagree with you more about your definition of motherhood. Giving birth doesn’t make you a mother. Raising a child, sticking by them, loving them no matter what, is what motherhood and fatherhood is.The people who invest so much of themselves into your well being are your ‘real’ parents. Most people can drop a baby out, but not everyone is capable of being a mother. Every time someone asks me who my ‘real’ parents are, I tell them that they are the people I call mom and dad. I say that I have never met my biological parents, who are simply the vessel through which I came into being. Then I was handed off to my ‘real’ parents. Sounds like you’ve had some misery in your life and are harboring some real resentments. I hope you find you way to acceptance, forgiveness and happiness
Thanks, Leslie, for sharing your experiences. It strikes me that there is such a wide range of responses to the experience of being adopted, and conversations like this make room for the range to be explored and heard by those raising adopted persons.
When a person refers to the woman who birthed me as my real mother, I feel that they understandable so, do not grasp the complexities of the adoptees’ life experiences. I feel both woman are my mother; each has contributed to me in distinctly different ways. After I searched and reunited with my birth mother, I realized how deeply I had been shaped by my experiences in my adoptive home. After over forty years of processing my connections with these two mothers, I believe that if I emphasis one over the other, I do a disservice to myself and to each of them. If I want to connect with my DNA heritage I must research those people with whom I share DNA with. If I want to understand my family heritage, I must research the lives of my ancestors in my adoptive family. I have very little family history in my birth parents’ families. Being adopted is a lifelong identity. I have been engaged in genealogical and family research for several years; and have often felt like a second class genealogist because I am adopted. While it is important to indicate how I am connected to the people in my family trees, I often I need to explain or defend my right to claim my complete heritage, which of course for me must include both connections. Thanks for this opportunity to express myself on a topic so dear to my heart.
Sally,
Thank YOU for so beautifully expressing your experiences and thoughts. I particularly resonated – from my position as an adoptive mom – with this: “After over forty years of processing my connections with these two mothers, I believe that if I emphasis one over the other, I do a disservice to myself and to each of them.” It’s an eloquent and poignant way to express what I’m learning/hearing my adopted children wrestle with as they grow and learn. At their young ages, they are both in the season of swinging from one side of this conversation to the other (and never on the same side of it at the same time, ha!) and your words helped me identify what that is for them.
I’m so glad you reached out. Please come back and read again!
I agree, hearing from more adopted people regarding adoption issues would help everyone. Too often, however, adopted adults have been excluded from discussions or not invited as panel speakers. These have been policy makers, researchers, and other professionals in the child/family welfare arena who are also adopted. Many are recognized and well-known in their fields, they care deeply about these issues, and they have a wealth of experience. They are apt at communicating their knowledge and experience. Their exclusion is a disservice to many families, communities, and child advocates. Please help to explicitly denounce those who actively exclude or dismiss them.
For example, the absolutely horribly proposed bill, CHIFF, adoption agencies and professionals were consulted, but organizations lead by adult adoptees were excluded. That is why there are so many gaping holes (moral, economic, and cultural) in their “expertise”. They could have conserved everyone’s efforts by including those most experienced before submitting this horrendous (and misleading) bill.
And, perhaps you could ask your AP network, how do they feel about unsealing adopted adults’ OBC’s? How much do they support and fund efforts to unseal them across the nation? I understand the concern of many adoptive parents to seek reassurance of their existence as parents. But many adopted adults seek validation/ reassurance of THEIR existence as well, as human beings who were born! Adoptive parents chose to become parents. Adopted people didn’t choose to become adopted and to be denied their OBC’s.
Interesting factoids:
1) Adoptions don’t require sealing of OBC’s – Kansas and Alaska NEVER sealed their OBC’s for adopted people.
2) Foster children who age out and don’t get adopted, never have their OBC sealed or altered. Only if someone adopts them is their OBC permanently sealed from them (in most states).
Adoptive parents who either 1) wish to keep OBC’s sealed, 2) believe that unsealing them is the adopted person’s issue to deal with, or 3) do nothing to restore the legal rights of all adopted people to obtain their unaltered, OBC’s in their state or nationwide, (IMHO) they aren’t fulfilling their duties as a parent. If supporting the equal rights of adopted people is too conflicting for them, then their maturity regarding parenthood is questionable (IMO).
Everyone can start here and spread the word:
http://petitions.moveon.org/sign/support-adoptee-rights
http://petitions.moveon.org/sign/an-executive-order-to-1
http://petitions.moveon.org/sign/support-adoptee-rights-1
Thank you!!
From the stories I’ve read it varies by each person based on their experience. Some feel as Von does and others feel as Debbie does. Each of them deserves to have their view expected. Like Von I tend to think the term “real” is offensive and it’s intention is to lower the value of others in their lives. I don’t think anyone should tell another person who their “real” family is.
In general, I think as people we define who are family and who are not. Even if we call certain individual family because we are obligated out of blood connections we might not necesarily feel that you have a close bond with them. For me though I’m not adopted have biological relatives I’m not close to at all while I have non biological relatives that I am. I think a lot of people have similar experiences.
So since you’re not adopted why do you think you have a right to make blanket statements like you have? Do you think you know more about what’s it’s like to have a period than a young woman does too Greg?..
I’m sick and tired of people saying harmful things to our cause and thinking they are experts when they don’t know what it feels like to be adopted or be oppressed with closed records at all. The image of The Fool comes to mind..
Kym
What do you think about correcting the ammended ones rather than unsealing the originals. Just put the amended certificate back to its original state because it was never necessary to give the adoptive parent authority over the adopted minor, they have the adoption papers and the name change papers. When a birth record is required show the original or the corrected amended one with the parents names on it. When proof of authority is required or proof of adoption is required show the adoption decree. No mess. I’d like to see adoptive parents fight for that way more than unsealing the original. Who wants an original if its not the one on file that bio relatives can locate to know they have a sibling or whatever. Just leave the original untouched and make it accessible the same way the rest of us have. Just equal like everyone else, it’d be easier to treat you equal than to let you have two certificates. Why two? Nobody else has two. It’s not even and equal.
People mean no offense when they say “real parent” they don’t mean real in the way of really raising the kid or care giver sense they mean real as in really related. There is an obligation that comes with having reproduced – the duty to raise the kid. We have adoption because we want to hold people accountable for their kids and make sure if someone else is raising them that they have permission to do so from a judge rather than a back street deal or whatever. People are naturally curious or nosey about why someone would not be taking care of their own offspring – they want to know if they had a good reason and if they are in contact with their kid. I said it’s nosey because it is sure – but it is not to discredit the hard work and heavy lifting of child care. Clearly if someone is an adoptive parent they are really doing the hard work of raising a child while the absent parents are not doing that hard work. Hopefully for their child’s sake they are doing as much as they can for their kid when they can. Childhood is only a small part of a person’s life and parents who did not raise their children have much to offer that only they can offer so hopefully they’ll begin contributing to their child’s life in meaningful ways at some point. Real just means related when it comes to someone’s child. Their child is like their arm or their nose their child is part of them. I agree with Debbie that a real mother is not necessarily one that raises her kid or if she does raise her kid she need not do a stellar job to qualify as real. She’s just really the one whose responsibility it was to take care of the kid cause she really put them on earth in a position to need to be raised in the first place. That kind of real will apply to her even if she runs. Not something a person can get away from once they have offspring. They are a real parent with a real obligation. There are also real adoptive parents with real adoptive obligations. They just get their obligations through different means.
debbie –
But you can know that your mother is your mother and your adoptive mother is your adoptive mother and it does not take away all your childhood memories of them raising you they don’t have to have the title to have done the job and even done it well. Is that correct?
I had a great weekend with my best friend she turned 30 and we had a bbq on the beach with her mother who I found for her after a five year search. It was so fantastic to see them spitting image of each other physically, mentally, humor all of it, amazing. So nice to hear her say “mom pass the ketchup” or her kid say “gramma come look at what I made.” Very surreal experience just got home from it. My friend does not yet feel like her daughter cause they are just getting to know each other but she says she knows she’s her daughter and she’s having fun just seeing how its not her fault that her teeth suck, that sort of thing.
Not everyone can or should raise their kid. But it is their job to make sure that their kid is properly taken care of in their absense and its their job to do whatever they can for their kid as soon as they can and for as long as they can. If they can’t start until the kid is 25 or 65 just start in. They are the real deal they made them and only they owe it to the kid to care and be responsible for them, nobody else had that special duty. Others can step in and help take over and thank goodness if its needed but they are there because the people that owe it are not taking care of it, not because it was their job in the first place. That original duty from causing the kid is the real genuine indebtedness part you can’t get away from. That’s my take from helping people search and listening anyway.
Quick comment to say it’s cool that you wrote the phrase adopted people rather than children. I know language police gets tedious but the phrase applies to the adult and minor equally and interchangeably and makes it easy to see a whole person over a life time. Very forward thinking and respectful
my bio parents are my real parents…they made me exist. the meaning of the word real is genuine etc.. so the adopters are the fake parents.. because they are not my real parents.. why the government thinks its ok to issue us with fake birth certificates ill never know.. so if people ask I say im visiting my real mother and when I visit my adoptive mother I say im visting my adoptive mother… im mean god im the spitting image of my real mother and look nothing alike the adopter..every adoptee knows that the adopting parents are not there real parents..real has nothing to do with who looked after you as a kid.. I restrain myself from calling the adopters the kidnappers… ( in which is the correct term.. out of respect that they didn’t realize at the time buying a baby is not the thing to do with out consequences)
I totally agree with you and feel the same.
As an adoptee for 70 years I find the use of the term ‘real’ quite offensive. When I write I call my mother ‘mother’ and my adoptive mother my amother and refer to my aparents. It is simple and works for me.
Thank you. We are just reaching the age to begin the discussion of what adopted means with our son. IHe knows he is adopted and was in an orphanage but does not yet have a concept of why or he got there. We struggle with trying to determine the best terminology to use. We have been very diligent and intentional in our quest to give him sufficient language skills to explain and understand and inquire about his world. Most of what I read is birth vs. bio. I like the fact that many said just two mothers and fathers but different capacities. I also like the statement that ultimately it is the adoptee’s decision how to define parental and familial roles.
Well go tell the other adopters that, that yes it is OUR decision. When we say we feel our biological mothers are our real mothers the majority of them go Betty Broderick all over us and I am sick of it. We didn’t make any of you infertile and you didn’t make us exist so either way, none of this is our fault. And why that reality is so hard to grasp is beyond me..
This is what makes PC terminology so difficult; everyone has their own opinion. Even if you are trying to be sensitive you may very well get it wrong. I think my take away from this is that if you don’t know someone well then you have no business asking them such personal questions. If it is someone you are close enough to to discuss personal matters then you should just ask them what term they prefer.