Surprising Twist in Sophia Vergara / Nick Loeb Lawsuit over 2 Frozen Embryos



sofia-vergaraThe Sofia Vergara / Nick Loeb lawsuit over two frozen embryos they created during an IVF procedure when they were engaged in 2013 has some new twists. Vergara (known widely for her role on the hit sit-com, Modern Family) wants the embryos to remain frozen indefinitely, while Loeb (a businessman and founder of the International Production Company) wants to receive custody of the embryos. The case was filed in California and the judge was likely going to rule in favor of Vergara because Loeb refused to comply with a discovery order to disclose the name of former girlfriend who had abortions during their relationships with him.

A new lawsuit has been filed in Louisiana naming the two embryos as plaintiffs arguing that they have the right to be transferred into a uterus.

The Daily Beast reports:

There is no request for financial award, because, the petition states, “there is no adequate amount of money that could remedy the loss of life of Emma and Isabella, two unique human beings.” Instead representatives for the embryos—which remain frozen in California—are asking the court order their immediate transfer to a uterus so that they can develop and be born. This can be accomplished, the suit argues, if a court will declare the California fertility contract signed by Loeb and Vergara void, since it didn’t include a provision concerning the fate of the embryos should the couple break up. Further they’re asking the court to terminate Vergara’s parental rights and reclassify her as an egg donor. Citing child neglect laws, the complaint claims “By leaving Emma and Isabella in a tank in a medical clinic for more than three years and refusing to consent to their development or care, Vegara has effectively abandoned and chronically neglected and Emma and Isabella.”

This case is unprecedented even in Louisiana, which has the strictest personhood law in the nation. So called “personhood laws” give embryos and fetuses the rights of a person.

Regardless of how the suit turns out, this is a cautionary tale to make sure that you decide in advance of an IVF cycle what will happen to any remaining cyropreserved embryos if your relationship splits up.

09/12/2016 | by News | Categories: Infertility, Infertility News | 0 Comments

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Back to Top ↑

Content created by Creating a Family. And remember, there are no guarantees in adoption or infertility treatment. The information provided or referenced on this website should be used only as part of an overall plan to help educate you about the joys and challenges of adopting a child or dealing with infertility. Although the following seems obvious, our attorney insists that we tell you specifically that the information provided on this site may not be appropriate or applicable to you, and despite our best efforts, it may contain errors or important omissions. You should rely only upon the professionals you employ to assist you directly with your individual circumstances. CREATING A FAMILY DOES NOT WARRANT THE INFORMATION OR MATERIALS contained or referenced on this website. CREATING A FAMILY EXPRESSLY DISCLAIMS LIABILITY FOR ERRORS or omissions in this information and materials and PROVIDES NO WARRANTY OF ANY KIND, implied, express or statutory. IN NO EVENT WILL CREATING A FAMILY BE LIABLE FOR ANY DAMAGES, including without limitation direct or indirect, special, incidental, or consequential damages, losses or expenses arising out of or in connection with the use of the information or materials, EVEN IF CREATING A FAMILY OR ITS AGENTS ARE NEGLIGENT AND/OR ARE ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGES.