Kentucky Judge, Citing Conscience, Declines to Hear Same-Sex Adoption Cases



Judge W. Mitchell Nance of the Kentucky Family Court in Barren and Metcalfe Counties has recused himself from all adoption cases involving same sex parents. Citing his “conscience” in a court order released on Thursday, April 27th, Judge Nance stated that he would find it impossible to be impartial and does not believe “under any circumstances” that a child’s best interests would be served by being adopted and raised by a same-sex couple. The judge’s recusal comes more than a year after the last state ban on same-sex adoption was struck down in Mississippi.

Critics of the judge’s position are now questioning his abilities to be impartial in any situation that goes against his personal belief system. Mr. Marcosson, former board member of the of the National Lesbian and Gay Legal Association, thinks that the recusal from adoption cases is not sufficient.

He’s sent a message, an explicit message, that he’s biased about a whole range of issues that might come before him. If a judge simply cannot apply the law because of his or her personal views, it’s perfectly honorable for that judge to resign.

Not surprisingly, Judge Nance’s actions are being lauded by groups on the other side of the controversial topic. One such group is Lexington-based, Family Foundation. Their mission is to “strengthen Kentucky families” and their spokesperson, Martin Cothran, had this to say about the judge’s statement:

If we are going to let liberal judges write their personal biases and prejudices into law, as we have done on issues of marriage and sexuality, then, in the interest of fairness, we are going to have to allow judges with different views to at least recuse themselves from such cases.

It’s important to note that research in recent years shows that children raised by same-sex parents are faring well. Associate professor Abbie Goldberg of Clark University says that “children of same-sex couples have consistently measured similarly to children of heterosexual couples in areas like self-esteem, depression, anxiety and satisfaction.

For more information, Creating a Family offers these resources:

Photo Credit: Michael Nagle for the NY Times

02/05/2017 | by News | Categories: Adoption, Adoption News | 1 Comments

One Response to Kentucky Judge, Citing Conscience, Declines to Hear Same-Sex Adoption Cases

  1. Avatar Amanda Wujcik says:

    People really think a child is better off being bounced from foster home to foster home rather than being raised by two men or two women who love each other?
    And what if a gay parent has custody of their biological child? Do these people think their parental rights should be severed?
    I can’t comprehend this.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Back to Top ↑

Content created by Creating a Family. And remember, there are no guarantees in adoption or infertility treatment. The information provided or referenced on this website should be used only as part of an overall plan to help educate you about the joys and challenges of adopting a child or dealing with infertility. Although the following seems obvious, our attorney insists that we tell you specifically that the information provided on this site may not be appropriate or applicable to you, and despite our best efforts, it may contain errors or important omissions. You should rely only upon the professionals you employ to assist you directly with your individual circumstances. CREATING A FAMILY DOES NOT WARRANT THE INFORMATION OR MATERIALS contained or referenced on this website. CREATING A FAMILY EXPRESSLY DISCLAIMS LIABILITY FOR ERRORS or omissions in this information and materials and PROVIDES NO WARRANTY OF ANY KIND, implied, express or statutory. IN NO EVENT WILL CREATING A FAMILY BE LIABLE FOR ANY DAMAGES, including without limitation direct or indirect, special, incidental, or consequential damages, losses or expenses arising out of or in connection with the use of the information or materials, EVEN IF CREATING A FAMILY OR ITS AGENTS ARE NEGLIGENT AND/OR ARE ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGES.