• SUBSCRIBE TO NEWSLETTER


  • To Know or Not to Know with Donor Egg or Sperm

    Dawn Davenport

    3

    I was consulting with a couple last month about the choices there were facing in their fertility treatment.  They had reached the point where their options were using donor egg with IVF, using donated embryos, or adoption.  During our discussion about using donor egg, I mentioned that one of the decisions they would have to make was whether to use an identified donor—meaning an egg donor who had agreed to provide identifying information and was open to future contact.  The woman said that she absolutely didn’t want to know any identifying information about the donor because “I want to be my child’s only mother.” Oh, if only third party reproduction were so simple.2470792160_d1f70675a0_n

    Don’t get me wrong–I’m very clear that the woman who raises the child is 100% the mother.  No question about it.  But with donor egg and embryo, and with adoption, like it or not, there is always the presence of another.  With adoption, we call this woman a mother—birth mother or first mother.  Not so with donor egg.  The egg donor in known as a donor—neither she nor the intended parents view her as a mother in any way.  So why should you even consider getting information about this person to allow contact in later life?

    Over Father’s Day, the New York Times ran an op-ed by a young man that was conceived by donor sperm. Although he doesn’t speak for the general universe of donor conceived kids any more than one essay by an adult adoptees speaks for the universe of adopted persons or one infertility patient’s experience can be generalized to all infertility patients, he does represent one view.  The first generation of children conceived by donor gametes (in this case sperm) are of the age now to be able to tell us what it’s like from their perspective.  I think we should listen.

    “My mom’s decision [to conceive as a single woman with donor sperm] intrigued many people. Some saw it as a triumph of female self-sufficiency. But others, particularly her close friends and family, were shocked. “You can’t have a baby without a man!” they would gasp. It turns out, of course, you can, and pretty easily. The harder part, at least for that baby as he grows older, is the mystery of who that man was. Or is.

    The emotional and developmental deficits that stem from an ignorance of one’s origins are still largely ignored.  I understand why fertility centers chose to keep sperm donation anonymous. They were attempting to prevent extra chaos, like custody battles, intrusion upon happy families (on either party’s side), mothers showing up on donors’ doorsteps with homely, misbegotten children with runny noses and untied shoelaces to beg for child support.  But babies born of the procedure in the future should have the right to know who their donors are, and even have some contact with them. Sperm donors need to realize that they are fathers.  It’s entirely reasonable, and yet the void that many children and young adults born from artificial insemination experience from simply not knowing transcends reason.  I am sometimes overwhelmed by the infinite possibilities, by the reality that my father could be anywhere: in the neighboring lane of traffic on a Friday during rush hour, behind me in line at the bank or the pharmacy, or even changing the oil in my car after many weeks of mechanical neglect.

    I am sometimes at such a petrifying loss for words or emotions that make sense that I can only feel astonished by the fact that he could be anyone.”

    The research has yet to be done on the impact of anonymity on children conceived through donor egg.  Perhaps it will be different for them.  Most children conceived through donor sperm (at least those who have been told) are children of single women, many of whom were not raised with a dad.  It is possible that some of their longing to know about their donor, is the longing for a nonexistent father, rather than simply a desire for biological information.  The vast majority of children conceived through donor egg are being raised by a mother, so perhaps the longing for information won’t be there.  But perhaps it will be the same.

    I think the desire for more information is driven by many factors—not the least of which is the personality and temperament of the child.  It is certainly possible that children conceived through donor egg will not follow the pattern that we’ve seen with adopted children and donor sperm conceived children, but why run the risk?  Maybe your child will never want or need this information, but what if they do?  Why not be prepared just in case?

    I suspect that the woman I spoke with last month was afraid that identifying information about this woman who provided the seed from which her child would grow, would somehow diminish her role as the “real” mother.  She needn’t worry.  A real mom is the one who wipes noses, establishes rules, and worries about what needs to be worried about.  She is the one who is there to experience the big and little everyday wonders.  DNA has little to do with any of that.

    Image credit:  Steve V.

    05/07/2011 | by Dawn Davenport | Categories: Blog, Infertility, Infertility Blog | 3 Comments



    subscribe to newsletter

    3 Responses to To Know or Not to Know with Donor Egg or Sperm

    1. marilynn` says:

      I guess in the end I agree with the author with the exception of playing with language and not referring to her as their mother. Time passes for the Egg Donor too. Just like it did for the expectant mother that carried the pregnancy. Baby popped out and one became the birth mother on record the other became a bio mother. Whether its what she intended or not it is what happened.

    2. marilynn` says:

      I reunite these separated families for free and I can assure you that they do think of their biological mothers as their biological mothers they just don’t want to make waves with their social mothers. Oh sure not all of them think that way. Although it is true from a medical standpoint you just can’t get around the fact that the woman whose biology is reproduced in their bodies is what is known the world over as a biological mother. They were raised by what the ASRM says are their birth mothers of record. Of course they have a bonded relationship with their birth mother of record that they don’t have with their biological mother’s. Of course they are more bonded to their birth mother of record’s families than they are to their own families.

      Imagine being told all the time that your biological mother was just a donor and not a mother she did not want to be your mother and imagine being told that you did not belong to her family even though you were just as related to her as any kid she’d raised. Imagine hearing how unimportant “the genetic connection is” when it was important enough for your dad to keep you. Why would your bio Dad think you were important enough to raise if it was so unimportant to raise his own offspring he would have adopted. The mixed messages they get have a logical result. Don’t be fooled by the ‘silent majority’ that are so content they say nothing. They’d be rising to the defense of their social parents if they were that happy not being allowed to be part of their own families as well as be part of their social families. When they find out that their bio mother and her family have been searching for them – not to steal away from the social mother – but just to include them in their family as well, they are so happy.

      Being part of their biological families does not undermine their place in their social families at all. Women raising egg donor babies need to relax about that and also need to use language that respects the medical reality of their kinship and not refer to them as donors. They WERE donors before their biological children were born; now they are mothers. Its just a fact that can’t be pretended away. They have offspring and they are mothers some day they will be grandmothers. They are not raising their children so they lack that fuzzy warm motherly connection with them. That is the important part right?

      Not referring to them as mothers is the part that makes the kids go behind their backs.

    3. Jennifer says:

      I feel that the only ethical option is to use a known donor – for the child’s sake. That way they have the option of knowing their roots. I think parents tend to forget that when “they want” a baby – that the baby is going to grow up and have a life and thoughts of its own.

    Leave a Reply

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

    You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

    Back to Top ↑

    Content created by Creating a Family. And remember, there are no guarantees in adoption or infertility treatment. The information provided or referenced on this website should be used only as part of an overall plan to help educate you about the joys and challenges of adopting a child or dealing with infertility. Although the following seems obvious, our attorney insists that we tell you specifically that the information provided on this site may not be appropriate or applicable to you, and despite our best efforts, it may contain errors or important omissions. You should rely only upon the professionals you employ to assist you directly with your individual circumstances. CREATING A FAMILY DOES NOT WARRANT THE INFORMATION OR MATERIALS contained or referenced on this website. CREATING A FAMILY EXPRESSLY DISCLAIMS LIABILITY FOR ERRORS or omissions in this information and materials and PROVIDES NO WARRANTY OF ANY KIND, implied, express or statutory. IN NO EVENT WILL CREATING A FAMILY BE LIABLE FOR ANY DAMAGES, including without limitation direct or indirect, special, incidental, or consequential damages, losses or expenses arising out of or in connection with the use of the information or materials, EVEN IF CREATING A FAMILY OR ITS AGENTS ARE NEGLIGENT AND/OR ARE ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGES.